- Track your orders
- Save your details for express checkout
Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press "Save" after adding each new registrant.
This book is only available in PDF format
Published: 19 March, 2012
Pages: 79
In the daily joys and intricacies of legal practice it is tempting to overlook the social and legal context of s 21 agreements. Yet they are not simply legal contracts between two people who are either dangerously entwined or becoming disentangled that are entered into in a vacuum; s 21 agreements are domesticated creatures of statute.
In England (and historically NZ), pre-nuptial contracts were until recently declared void as contrary to public policy under the rule in Hyman v Hyman. The rationale for that approach was because such agreements were considered to be undermining of the very institution of marriage since they effectively contemplated its demise. Additionally, in the first half of last century, marriage generated a legally enforceable obligation to continue to live together and enjoy (or endure) conjugal rights. A pre-nuptial contract was therefore considered to be objectionable on the ground that it undercut those legal obligations, as well as being morally offensive.
Vivienne Crawshaw Barrister Auckland |
His Honour Judge Murfitt District Court Christchurch |