- Track your orders
- Save your details for express checkout
Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press "Save" after adding each new registrant.
On Demand Module l Booklet l PowerPoint Presentation
Note: Access to the online files is via your "My CPD" page. If you would like to purchase multiple packages, please contact us here.
This module will provide practical advice on how to engage with and get the best results for your intellectually disabled clients.
People with intellectual disability are vulnerable within the courts, and often require strong advocacy from their legal counsel to achieve their right to equal access to justice.
This module will draw on recent New Zealand research involving people with an intellectual disability themselves, lawyers, and judges to outline common challenges faced by this vulnerable group when involved in the legal system. A practical approach to conducting appropriate and effective legal interviews will also be presented and discussed.Please contact us if you use a dial up internet connection.
This paper has been developed to underpin a NZLS CLE webinar that has the purpose of building capacity within criminal lawyers who represent people with intellectual disability. The paper incorporates three parts: an overview of what international research in the area of people with intellectual disability in the legal system; findings of recent New Zealand research that includes the views and experiences of people with intellectual disability themselves; and a framework for providing responsive and effective legal representation for people with intellectual disability, referred to here as “interviewing to find the person.”
________________________________________
1 A range of definitions are used to describe intellectual disability however for the purposes of this report the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities definition is used: “Intellectual disability is characterised by significant limitations in both intellectual and adaptive functioning and adaptive behaviour as expressed in conceptual, social and practical skills. This disability originates before age 18.” The authors acknowledge the preference expressed by New Zealand self-advocacy organisation People First for people with intellectual disability to be referred to as people with learning disability, but for reasons of consistency and clarity have used the term intellectual disability in this paper.
2 Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act, 1988: New Zealand.
3 Intellectual Disability (Compulsory Care and Rehabilitation) Act 2003: New Zealand.
4 Ministry of Health, The New Zealand Disability Strategy, O.o.D. Issues, Editor 2001, Ministry of Health: Wellington. p 1-37.
5 The United Nations, United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2006.
6 Office for Disability Issues. Disability Action Plan 2014-2018. 2014. Wellington.
7 Johnston, H., Henaghan, M., and Mirfin-Veitch, B.The experiences of parents with an intellectual disability in the New Zealand Family Court System. New Zealand Family Law, 2007. 5(9): p 226-236.
8 United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Concluding observations on the initial report of New Zealand. October 2014. Geneva.
9 Mirfin-Veitch, B., Gates, S., Diesfeld, K., and Henaghan, M, 2014. Developing a more responsive legal system for people with intellectual disability in New Zealand. Dunedin: Donald Beasley Institute.
David Allan Barrister Hamilton |
Dr Brigit Mirfin-Veitch Director, Donald Beasley Institute Dunedin |